Ukrainian air defense (PVO) once again demonstrates its readiness for new challenges. This time the enemy is preparing a “surprise” in the form of “Cedar” missiles, which could pose a serious problem for any country. The main feature is that ballistic missiles of this type can split into six separate warheads after launch. But Ukrainian defenders already have a plan to counter this threat.
What’s Wrong with “Cedar”?
“Cedar” is a new type of ballistic missiles being developed in Russia. Their main feature is that they do not fly as a single unit but split into six separate blocks, each of which can target independently. This technology, similar to the operation principle of many modern intercontinental missiles, significantly complicates their interception.
Previously, most air defense systems were set up to target objects as a whole, but the new missiles force adaptation in approaches to counter them.
Is it Safe to Destroy Nuclear Missiles in the Air?
One of the key questions is whether intercepting missiles carrying nuclear warheads will trigger a nuclear explosion. If it does, then it makes little sense for the population: whether the explosion occurs above the ground or upon impact with it.
Experts reassure that simply shooting down the missile does not lead to a nuclear explosion. A nuclear warhead only detonates under certain mechanisms controlled activation at a precisely defined moment.
Intercepting missiles in the air is a common practice for countries with advanced air defense systems, and so far, there have been no recorded cases of it leading to an uncontrolled explosion.
Why Was It Harder to Intercept Ballistic Missiles Before?
Ballistic missiles remain some of the most challenging targets to intercept due to their high speed and flight trajectory. Most of them fly outside the atmosphere, making it difficult to detect them in the early stages. In the 20th century, interception of such missiles was practically impossible due to the lack of appropriate technologies.
However, modern systems such as Patriot, NASAMS, and SAMP/T are capable of detecting and destroying targets even at high altitudes and speeds. Recent successes of the Ukrainian Air Defense in intercepting Russian missiles, including “Kinzhals,” prove that even the most advanced threats can be neutralized.
Strategies to Combat “Kedr” Missiles
According to military experts, an effective tactic against “Kedr” is destroying individual warheads after their separation. Since the missile is a single entity in the initial stage of flight, intercepting before separation can reduce the threat’s effectiveness. However, in practice, this is often challenging, so the focus will be on destroying already separated parts.
Ukrainian defenders have experience in shooting down similar targets and continuously improve their skills. Systems like Patriot can track multiple objects simultaneously and effectively work against separating missiles.
Should Air Defense Systems Be Trusted?
Ukrainian air defense has repeatedly proven its efficiency. Just recall the downing of hypersonic “Kinzhals” missiles – before a full-scale war, this was considered impossible. However, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have shown that even the most advanced missiles can be neutralized with the right technologies, training, and determination.
The Russian strategy of intimidation through new missiles does not work. On the contrary, the Ukrainian army gains more experience, adapts to new challenges, and impresses the world with its resilience.
Each new attack becomes a challenge, but also a stimulus for improvement. Ukrainian defenders not only defend the sky, but also set an example for other countries on how to effectively resist terror. And although the “Kedr” drones may look like a serious threat, for Ukrainian air defense forces it is just another opportunity to demonstrate their strength.
